Public Voices of Vancouver: Reflections on the Election and Civic Duty

As Election 2025 approaches, voters across Canada and Greater Vancouver—including residents —are preparing to cast their ballots for their preferred Members of Parliament. For politicians, a federal election is a pivotal moment—a chance to rally support, promote their platforms, and secure power. But what about the people? What do everyday citizens think about the state of democracy and the promises being made?

Sherry Soltani – Local Journalism Initiative

To find out, LJI journalist Sherry from Skyrise Media Society arranged a series of street interviews in the heart of Vancouver, engaging directly with residents to hear their thoughts on the election, leadership, and what it truly means to participate in a democratic society.

"During election time, candidates have the opportunity to present themselves and share their plans," Sherry explained. "However, we don’t often hear from the public about their opinions on the candidates and the promises they make. Today, we’re out on the streets of Vancouver, interviewing people to hear what they think."

What unfolded was a candid civic dialogue—a chorus of diverse voices expressing both hope and skepticism. While many described voting as a fundamental civic duty essential to protecting rights, influencing leadership, and shaping the future for the next generation, others raised questions about its real impact in a representative democracy.

For some, voting is not only a political act but a moral one. Referencing thinkers like Henry David Thoreau, several interviewees emphasized the ethical responsibility to vote in alignment with one’s values—even when the choices are imperfect.

A common thread throughout the interviews was a desire for genuine change and accountability. Some respondents voiced cautious support for the Conservative Party while expressing concern over its ideological evolution since the Reform Party era. Others criticized the current Liberal leadership for failing to deliver on critical issues such as homelessness, housing affordability, and healthcare. In many cases, voters described casting their ballot as choosing “the lesser of evils” rather than endorsing a compelling vision for the country.

Frustration over broken promises and political scandals ran deep. “It’s hard to trust anyone anymore,” one resident said. “They say the right things during campaigns, but then nothing happens.” Despite this, many citizens stressed the importance of staying informed, noting that technology has made it easier than ever to research candidates and policies. “We all have access to the facts now,” a young voter added. “If we’re uninformed, that’s on us.

Public opinion on leadership painted a picture of high expectations: charisma and party affiliation weren’t enough. Residents called for leaders with integrity, empathy, and the courage to make hard decisions in the public interest. For some, this meant reducing government control and advocating for individual freedoms. For others, it meant amplifying voices from marginalized communities and creating inclusive policies that serve all citizens.

As the interviews wrapped up, a shared sentiment of cautious optimism began to surface. While cynicism and doubt were evident, so too was a belief in the enduring power of civic engagement. Many acknowledged that democracy doesn’t end at the ballot box—it’s a continuous process that requires participation, vigilance, and informed dialogue. In the heart of Vancouver, amid the clamor of a busy city, Election 2025 is more than a political contest—it’s a moment of reflection for the people. A chance not only to choose who will lead but to reconsider what kind of country we want to build together.