During the Affordability Committee meeting at Barrie City Hall, residents voiced strong opposition to a proposed development at 127 and 131 Arda Road. The plan seeks to replace two single-detached homes with 19 three-story townhouses, requiring amendments to current zoning regulations for increased density, reduced setbacks, and altered landscaping requirements.

Deepak Bidwai – Local Journalism Initiative

Daphne Gokcen, a planning consultant with Innovative Planning Solutions, representing the property owner, presented the proposal. She argued the project aligns with city goals for intensification along arterial roads, citing similar developments in the area. Gokcen also addressed concerns over parking and tree removal, noting that some trees marked for removal were deemed unsafe and would be replaced with new plantings.

Residents raised significant objections. Brian Smith criticized the density increase as excessive, arguing it undermines the neighborhood's character. He criticized the project as “a tenfold increase in density” that would negatively impact the neighborhood’s character. "There's nothing gentle about it."

Luciano Garcia, a nearby property owner, highlighted privacy concerns, particularly with the proposed five-meter rear setback and three-story height. He advocated for reducing the number of units and increasing setbacks to preserve privacy and minimize overcrowding. Harjinder Singh echoed these concerns, emphasizing the development's impact on the area's quiet, low-density nature.

City staff, represented by Planner Riley Anderson, outlined the ongoing review process. Staff are assessing compliance with city and provincial planning policies, as well as potential impacts on traffic, parking, and neighborhood character. Anderson confirmed a final staff report would be presented in early 2025.

Ward 6 Councillor Nigussie, in whose ward the development is located, emphasized the importance of balancing neighborhood character with development needs. He noted that under the draft zoning bylaw, similar developments could proceed with fewer approvals, raising concerns about long-term implications. Residents called for a re-evaluation of the project to better balance housing needs with community preservation.

The proposal remains under review, with staff pledging to address public feedback before making a recommendation to the council.

The second zoning by-law amendment, for 282 King Street, proposes a change to permit automotive sales and leasing. This application did not receive significant public concerns during meetings. Staff are reviewing compliance with planning policies and traffic impacts and are expected to approve the proposal.